At Hazi Fundazioa we know how hard it is successfully to undertake any business project, above all when its complexity demands the involvement of financial or industrial partners in order to prosper, and so together with the Metxa project accelerator, we here present our investment search manual, with a particular emphasis on the food and timber value chain, and on rural and coastal development in the Basque Country.
The guide is based on Metxa’s wealth of experience in the field of business project investment and development, alongside the opinion of the leading experts in the region. We would once again like to thank all those involved in the manual for their knowledge and skills.
And we would encourage all of you, businesspeople with an exciting, major project up your sleeves, to read this document carefully, because the success of your efforts depends to a great extent on proper planning of the different phases of the project from the outset, to ensure that you can access and even provide the necessary information, both internally and to your potential partners.
There are many complex documents that you will be asked for by those who are to join you in your business.
Remember that improvisation is an unreliable colleague in this type of enterprise venture.
It is no easy task to bring financial and industrial partners on board, but many projects need them to be involved, essentially for two reasons: the lack of finance on the part of the founders, and the need for additional expert knowledge from the world of business, beyond any possible technical skills.
Remember that the ONekin! team is always on hand to offer support and help you along your way.
Good luck, and get planning!
Initial recommendations:
Make sure you have enough time and energy before beginning the
process. Bear in mind that the process lasts 6 months on average.
It is very important to know you have the support of the whole group of
founding partners.
Brief yourself properly for the whole process.
Delegate all those functions you will not be able to handle during the
process, as a practical measure.
Think like an investor.How does one analyse an investment opportunity?
The three factors:
As business projects offer very little liquidity and a lot of risk, investors expect very high returns. Normally in excess of 10%.
Dilution is the reduction in the stake of the partners in a company as a consequence of a capital increase. Whenever we increase the capital, the company has to create new shares, to be bought by the new investor. This will automatically reduce our percentage stake as founders.
It is not a good idea to dilute our stake too much. By around 10-15% at most in each investment round.
How does an investor obtain their returns?
What types of investor are there?
There are three key types:
Family offices
Private companies that manage the investments of a family, whose financial capital is the wealth that they will typically have built up over several generations.
Agebts vs phases
Venture Capital funds. These are collective investment undertakings whose stakeholders are not involved in the investment decisions. It is the fund managers who decide and administer day-to-day investment matters. Such funds typically invest at the more advanced stages of a project
Corporate Venture. This concept arises when a large company uses an investment vehicle to invest in entrepreneurial projects.
Media for Equity. Under this model, large media groups generate discounted advertising for a company in exchange for a shareholding.
Banks. Most major banks have their own investment funds, with a huge array of different investment criteria.
These are government loans which are dependent on obtaining private investment, and are typically used by many entrepreneurs to complete their investment rounds. Their main feature is that they do not dilute the founders’ stake, as they are not considered investment.
At the national level, the most well-known are ENISA loans. In the Basque Country we have two bodies which grant equity participation loans: SPRI and Elkargi.
What aspects of the project does an investor weigh up?
What aspects of the market does an investor weigh up?
What are my business’s KPIs?
KPIs (key performance indicators) are the best way to measure the capacity to execute the project. KPIs must be measurable, relevant, easy to understand, and must have an owner.
1. If you could give just one tip to an entrepreneur looking for investment, what would it be?
It’s hard to give just one tip in a process with so many variables. But if I had to give just one, it would be to find a good lawyer with experience of startup investment rounds. There are various reasons why it makes sense to have someone like that by your side. First, because if they have experience in the sector, they can offer advice about how to focus the investment round strategy and even give tips about relevant information that the startup needs to present to the investor. They can also help make contact with potential investors. And above all, they will help in negotiations with the investor.
Over the course of a startup, it is really important to have the right investment agreements in place from the outset. We often come across startups that have come from previous investment rounds with shareholder agreements that make it really hard to bring in the new investors that are often needed if the company is to grow. Meanwhile, poor legal advice could make it much harder for professional investors to come on board.
Find yourself a good lawyer with experience in
startup investment rounds.
2. How would you at EASO Venture rate agri-food projects?
The agri-food sector, aside from being resilient and less volatile than others, is the focal point of new trends offering numerous opportunities for growth and investment. Many of these trends and opportunities are driven by startups, since the sector is in many cases short on digitalisation. Health regulations and the different opportunities that the sector has ahead of italso generate new needs to incorporate technology and new production processes.
But beyond innovative products or new services being developed within this sphere, what really matters is to clearly define the company’s business model. And above all to have a clear commercial strategy with a very clear focus on the target market. As investors, we care much more about the business model and the startup team, than the product or technology developed. And so our advice is for startup presentations not only to focus on the virtues of the product or technology, but clearly to present the problem they resolve, the target customer, the revenue model and the commercial strategy to be followed. And the team needs to be able to fulfil the needs of that strategy.
Have a clear business strategy with a very clear
focus on the target market.
Make sure you have enough time and energy before beginning the process. Bear in mind that the process lasts 6 months on average.
It is very important to know you have the support of the whole group of founding partners.
Brief yourself properly for the whole process.
Delegate all those functions you will not be able to handle during the
process, as a practical measure.
What aspects do we need to agree as founding partners before beginning around?
The cap table is a table (spreadsheet) setting out the history and current structure of our company’s share capital.
It is important in the early rounds for the founding partners to maintain a majority percentage of the company.
This is the typical cap table by phase:
Cap table:
Phantom shares are economic rights that the company recognises on the part of workers who are seen to be of huge value to the company, in order to build their loyalty and retain them
Phantom shares are formalised with an agreement between company and worker.
It is quite usual to assign 10% of the capital to phantom shares.
Question 1: In your experience, how many entrepreneurs are sufficiently prepared when they begin the process of seeking out investment?
In my experience, that depends a great deal on the investment round. Those handling an investment round for the first time are seldom sufficiently prepared. Meanwhile, those who are doing it for the second or third time are much better prepared thanks to the experience of previous rounds.
This manual will be really helpful for all of them, but above all for those facing it for the first time.
This manual will be of great help to all of them,
but especially to those who are facing it for the
first time.
Question 2: Give us three tips for a successful investment round:
One first tip would be to prepare the round sufficiently in advance. We have seen many rounds fail because of a lack of liquidity at the company to withstand the long process. A minimum of 6 months is an advisable timeframe.
Secondly, I would say that the round is a process which eats up a fair amount of time and emotional energy. The CEO must be ready to conduct the process as successfully as possible, to delegate some functions and have a balanced entourage to avoid being worn down too much.
Lastly, I would stress the importance of heading out to sell our project. Many entrepreneurs have this innate skill, but there are many others who find it hard to hit the road, attend events, meet people, etc. The success of an investment round depends in many cases on the quality and quantity of our contacts.
The success of an investment round depends in
many cases on the quality and quantity of our
contacts.
A presentation of our investment proposition to investors who could have an interest in our project. There are various types:
One Page. This is a presentation of our project on one single sheet, normally A4 printed on both sides.
Short Investor Deck. This is a short version we will use to email to potential investors. It shouldn’t have more than 15 or 20 pages.
Long Investor Deck. This is the version we can use as support at individual meetings with investors.
Visual Investor Deck. The visual investor deck is what we will use at our pitches.
Question 1: What are the three most common mistakes made by entrepreneurs when presenting their projects?
The main mistake is a lack of clarity in communication. In-depth knowledge of a project is not enough in order to talk about it effectively. The listeners have to understand us, and so we need to start building the house with the structure, the basis underpinning the communication. Then we will add the relevant details, and miss out anything that has nothing to add. Rambling is another mistake which can be avoided through a sound structure. And
lastly, we have to be really prepared, perhaps knowour pitch off by heart, so as to leave nothing to chance.
Question 2: How can technology help us be better public speakers?
We can use technology in hundreds of ways to speak better. AI can help us give a talk a more coherent structure, to summarise a long text or a dossier, to transform a technical text into content that non-technical people would understand (nothing beats asking ChatGPT, for example, to explain something so that your granny would understand it). We can also use AI to give us feedback about a speech we have given, telling us how many filler expressions we used, how often we paused, or if we tend to look more to one side of the audience.
The tool which has the job of planning enterprise decision-making.
Why is it important to have a Business Plan?
Be aware of who the Business Plan is intended for before getting started. The content needs to be adapted to each case.
The Business Plan must be fully consistent with our investor deck and with the financial forecasts.
The Business Plan is a living document. It should be updated at least each quarter. This will help us see the extent to which we are delivering on everything we set out in our initial Business Plan.
This document must be agreed by the whole founding team, the executive team and the investor partners. If we don’t reach agreement, it is very likely to prove difficult to put into operation, and will be a far from realistic document.
Question 1: What shortcomings do you tend to find in entrepreneurs’ business plans?
We have on occasion come across estimates (estimated P&L) inside the business plan which they often can’t justify. For example, presenting a growth rate in sales, and when you ask them how they arrived at that number, how they will achieve it, etc., they often can’t give a convincing explanation. And when making a business plan, the first thing is to be sure about what you are including and projecting, because the person in front of you is analysing not only the figures, but the way they are presented and whether they are consistent or not. You may come across situations such as: Business Plans that are highly theoretical, with too much text and a lack of specificity, a business model and pricing model without sufficient reflection, etc. How they will monetise their idea, which is vital for this type of business.
The next part doesn’t feature in the plan itself, but my position is that a plan is drawn up to attract finance or investors, and on occasion the parameters aren’t really clear about how much they need and what for.
If you are going to ask for finance at a startup, where the financing needs are more vague (it’s not a machine, for example, or real estate, where you know the price, but instead developments, marketing, attracting talent, etc.), then you will often find that the amount doesn’t tally (it may seem to make no difference whether you ask for €100K or €150K) and they haven’t specified what each element of the finance will be spent on.
Question 2: What type of checks do you typically run when assessing how strong a business plan is?
We normally ask about the estimates and their rationale, how they arrived at those figures, and if they can’t answer, that’s not a good sign. If they haven’t reflected on the business model, the prices, the margins, how they stand out, why people will buy from them, and what they will do to get people buying (commercial strategy). That is what we ask them.
To see if they have analysed the competition. Protection where necessary (patents, etc.) or legal barriers.
See if they are working with a cash flow budget, if they have estimated their cash levels and have done so properly. Reflect on whether the amounts set out in the estimated Balance Sheet and P&L make sense
We also tend to check whether they have tested the idea out on the market.
We usually ask about the estimates and their
reason for being, how they have arrived at them
and if they do not know how to answer, it is not
a good sign.
How much money will I need until I start to see recurrent revenue?… How much do I need to sell at my estimated price to cover my expenses?… What product do I need to promote?… When can I make my planned investment?… How does my business change after this investment?… What returns can I offer an investor?…
Show investors that our project is investible.
Help us to reach decisions.
Specify the short-term objectives and also, based on experience, steer a better-planned long-term course.
Distinguish between legal and accounting obligations in producing the forecasts: the former are a question of order and compliance, the latter a management matter.
STEP 1: ON A BLANK PIECE OF PAPER
STEP 2: CREATE THE HYPOTHESIS SHEET
STEP 3: ANALYTICAL P&L UP TO GROSS MARGIN. Over a timeframe of three or four years, with the early years on a monthly basis.
STEP 4: CONTINUE WITH THE ANALYTICAL P&L UP TO THE NET MARGIN
Discount the costs of attracting customers and impute these to the product on the basis of the average customer shopping basket hypothesis.
STEP 5: CONTINUE WITH THE ANALYTICAL P&L UP TO THE CONTRIBUTION MARGIN.
Group the products by channel and discount the inherent channel costs, which then gives us the margin of contribution by each channel to the overall project.
STEP 6: GENERATE THE FULL ANALYTICAL P&L.
Deduct the fixed structural costs for the whole project from the contribution margin of all the channels, and arrive at the result for the financial year.
STEP 7: OBTAIN THE FINANCIAL P&L
Taking the Analytical P&L as our basis , we order the information in accordance with the general chart of accounts, and obtain the Financial P&L, arriving at the same result.
STEP 8: SET UP THE CASH FLOWS
From the Financial Income Statement to the Cash Flows there are a number of intermediate concepts:
STEP 9: PROJECT THE WHOLE PERIOD.
Once we have set up the first year on a monthly basis, we project the rest of the period of 3 or 4 years.
STEP 10: ANALYSE WHAT OUR PROJECTIONS SAY.
They give us information about product, customer and channel profitability. What to sell, to whom and via which channel, which to promote, etc.?
How much we need to sell to cover the structure we require. And if we achieve a cost reduction at any point of the process chain.
But above all, they give us information about cash, how much we need now and how much we will foreseeably generate through our business over the next 4 years.
If we want a partner for our business to finance our needs now, we will need to convince them by offering them a sufficient return tomorrow.
STEP 11: SIMULATE DIFFERENT SCENARIOS
As we compare our hypotheses against reality, we can progressively adjust them to give us different scenarios. We can see how the cash figure changes in response to modifications to:
Financial forecasts are a tool which help us to Plan, Control, and ultimately to reach decisions in our project, in anticipation of results.
They must be produced in a straightforward manner, but also as a bespoke calculation specific to this project, and manageable for its administrators.
The EBITDA concept we have looked at is a simplification of the operating cash generated by our project, and we should focus on this idea before moving on to the next chapter: Valuation of my project.
Question 1: Why are financial forecasts important when they are generally not kept to?
Financial forecasts are just as important as having Google Maps in a city you don’t know. Can you manage without this application? Yes, but you certainly won’t get where you want to go by the best way.
Financial forecasts help you to:
Question 2: Do you think that monitoring liquid assets and finances is a service that can be sub- contracted at the early stages?
No, I don’t think so. I think it is very important to differentiate between the accounting, tax and legal obligations of a business and its management. The former can be conducted, and far better, by a consultant’s office, but the latter has to be done by the entrepreneur, and the short- and the medium- term liquid asset forecasts and control must be made by the person who has drawn up the forecasts, who should, at least initially, be the entrepreneur themselves or a member of their team.
We will now analyse how a potential Investor appraises our project. Aside from other correlated reasons, we will focus on the Investor’s weighting of Risk versus Return, comparing the project against other investment opportunities available to them.
WHAT IS AN INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY?
Any opportunity where paying out money now will generate a return in the future which is greater than other options. In other words, a return above what we consider “normal”. Rather like paying a lower price than the value we would assign to what we acquire. One single project may have different values for different people.
RETROSPECTIVE: it is worth what it has generated so far. The real value lies in the business assets. There is no interest in what its activity could generate.
PROSPECTIVE: The valuable part of the business is the return that I could obtain in the future from its activity. If I can do so with fewer assets, all the better.
COMPARITIVE: To value the project I focus on the value of another similar or comparable project. The difficulty lies in finding that comparable venture.
In entrepreneurial projects, we typically combine the prospective and comparative approaches.
COMPARING OPPORTUNITIES.
The commonly accepted methods to value and compare investment opportunities are as follows:
This is based on obtaining the cash flows that the project will generate in the future and transferring them to the present, discounting them at a rate which considers the risk involved in generating those projected flows.
HOW THE RISK IS WEIGHTED
We think about how the project will be financed. What percentage of internal funds (from partners) and what percentage of outside funds (from financial institutions) it will have, to which we then apply the required rate of return. This is what is known as the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC).
Bear in mind that partners do not ask for the same rate of return from two businesses with differing risks. The more risk there is, the greater the return they will demand to offset the risk they face.
This is calculated by means of a risk-free financial asset. For example, 10 year bonds, to which we add the additional risk corresponding to the investment, the Risk Premium for Spain * the Beta of the Asset, with certain additional correctors applied, such as the fact of it being a small company or small stake, which might be difficult to transfer.
COMPARING OPPORTUNITIES.
1. THE DISCOUNTED FREE CASH FLOW METHOD.
This Valuation method is typically contextualised with the following method.
2. THE MULTIPLIER METHOD (COMPARATIVE APPROACH).
This method is based on finding opportunities that are comparable to the one we are considering and that have already been through a transaction, which
shows us the valuation applied An indicator is taken from the company that has already completed a transaction, such as EBITDA, dividing the value by this indicator to give a multiplier, which we then apply to the EBITDA of our opportunity, to give our own value.
EV:€500,000 with EBITDA:€50,000. Multiplier EV/EBITDA: 10
The difficulty with this method lies in finding such Comparables.
The typical approach is to compare the valuation under the different methods to obtain a value range on which to negotiate the Price.
COMPARING OPPORTUNITIES.
THE PROBLEM OF NEW AND INCIPIENT PROJECTS. In projects where we have historical data it may not be difficult to calculate credible forecasts, and to seek out comparable companies in the sector, but for new projects, these generally accepted methods clearly pose substantial problems.
3. ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR NEW PROJECTS.
Before referring to these methods, we should mention that a professional investor, aware of the level of risk in such projects, and the difficulty in obtaining a demonstrable value, will aim to diversify their portfolio, investing in many different projects, and demanding the highest rates of return in all of them.
To a greater or lesser extent, all these methods apply the COMPARATIVE APPROACH.
QUALITATIVE METHODS
3.1 SCORECARD VALUATION.
This method is based on comparing the project in which one wishes to invest with one or more reference projects in the market or sector, and at the same stage of development. The comparison is applied to various key aspects. The factors typically used for the comparison are as follows:
The factors may be weighted according to their importance for the investor.
COMPARING OPPORTUNITIES.
3.2 BERKUS METHOD:this is very similar to the above. It is based on the experience built up by Dave Berkus in highly disruptive projects in their initial phases. As before, it weights 5 key factors. Each is given a value of 500,000 USD, with points awarded to the project being valued for each of these, from 0% to 100%.
The Scorecard and Berkus are qualitative methods for the weighting of key factors based on the experience of investors, and are very commonly used at the very early stages.
QUANTITATIVE METHODS
3.3 3 VENTURE CAPITAL (VC).
This is the method applied by Venture Capital investors (Chapter I – Investor Types in this manual). The project still has negative cash flow or insufficient cash to achieve the expected growth, but already has its product on a consolidated market. This is based on three cornerstones.
Value of the Company expected at the time of exit of the VC entering now. This value is obtained by means of multipliers of, for example, the EBITDA or expected Sales of the company in the exit year of other projects.
The return expected by the VC on this investment. Depending on the phase, this may range from 20% to 70%.
The effect of the dilution (reduction of their percentage in the event of the possible entry of other investors). There is a difference between holding the 35% purchased today, for example, and 30%, because other investors have entered along the way.
COMPARING OPPORTUNITIES.
The VC method uses the expected return on exit to give the value today. Professional investors with lengthy experience that are entering projects with high expected growth.
3.4 KPI MULTIPLIER METHOD:this is very similar to the multiplier approach seen under Method 2, but in this case we replace the EBITDA indicator (KPI)
with others, perhaps because the project EBITDA remains negative.
The indicators must be representative of the project’s progress. The difficulty lies in accessing information about these indicators from the project used as the reference.
For digital projects, for example, these are among the most commonly used. But for others it could be customers per hour, cost of acquisition of customer versus gross product margin…
Unlike the VC method, the multiplier is here applied at the moment of valuation, the entry rather than the exit.
The valuation techniques depend on the current stage of the project and the type of disruption it involves.
The commonly accepted discounted cash flow method makes more sense the more advanced the phase, and the greater the similarity with the sector.
The more innovative the project, and the earlier the current stage, then given the increased risk, an investor will be looking for the maximum diversification in their portfolio and the rates of return demanded will be much higher.
The comparative approach is used by way of corroboration or as the main method in all valuations, hence the importance of having information about
comparable companies. (See sources of info in the Manual)
It is very important for our project to conduct sound financial planning, so as both to keep the project afloat by ensuring cash requirements are
anticipated, and to defend valuations when facing investors.
Question 1: When you have to value a project, what working approach do you apply to the project? What are the key elements behind a good valuation?
If information is easy accessible, I look at the market and who the potential competitors would be. Of course it is essential to get to know the
entrepreneurs, the team in charge of putting it into practice.
In terms of valuation:
I always build up a business plan, the more information it has, the better. I normally estimate the best cost and expense performance based on revenues, estimate the investments and define the customer collection and supplier payment terms.
With all of that I generate a projected income statement, a projected balance sheet and the cash flows.
I decide what a reasonable discount rate could be, based on the project risk and whether or not there is any debt. The cash flows and the discount rate then give me my best estimate of the appraisal: the net present value.
If there is accessible information for multiples from similar companies or actual transactions involving similar projects/companies, I use cash flow discounting to compare the result of the valuation against the valuation by multiples.
Question 2: In projects with no historical data, what is your normal valuation method?
As I said under the previous point, I always draw up a business plan. The fact is that without historical data it is a much more difficult process. But I do it
anyway. I might focus more on what could happen in the third or fifth year, seeing if it is reasonable to attain a turnover that does not involve disrupting the market. I see the revenue variable as the most difficult to estimate, and the one that could have the biggest impact in terms of a valuation error by either of the methods.
In such cases the use of scenarios (base case, optimistic and pessimistic) is more helpful than when you have the historical data. I sometimes even use scenarios to weight the likelihood of occurrence of each of them, and so produce the best estimated value for the project.
The income variable is the most difficult to
estimate and the one that can have the
greatest effect in the face of an error in the
valuation by any of the methods.
Question 3: Are scenarios usually drawn up? What percentage correction is normally applied to the figures provided by an entrepreneur?
I always use scenarios and sensitivities as tools. Scenarios as I mentioned in question 2, and sensitivity to variations of more or less 15%, for example in the main business variables: how much worse is the valuation if staff costs are +5%, +10% or +15%? Making good use of Excel, both the scenarios and the sensitivities are easy to set up, and really help estimate the best range for a valuation.
The two tools described in the above paragraph allow you to play with the information given by the entrepreneur. In my case, what they tell me is what you could call the optimistic scenario. And from there I build up the other scenarios, and run the sensitivities, as I said.
The search for investment is very similar to a commercial process, and so we need to be ready to organise the sales funnel that any process involves. Imagine a spreadsheet with each potential investor on the vertical axis, and information about each of the investors on the horizontal axis. In general terms the columns of this spreadsheet could be as follows:
1. Company name, fund, investor.2. Full name of the contact person. 3. Position. 4. Address. 5. Email. 6. Landline number. 7. Mobile number. 8. Description.
Columns related to the process:
1. Status. 2. First sending. 3. Reminder email. 4. 1st Meeting. 5. 2nd Meeting. 6. Agreement. 7. Due Diligence. 8. Comments.
Aim to keep the spreadsheet fully up-to-date, and share updates with the founding team.
Financial and accounting situation: An analysis is conducted of the state of the accounts, accounting records, margins, fixed assets, etc.
Fiscal situation: The company’s situation is reviewed in terms of all taxes, levies, charges, etc.
Commercial situation: This involves an analysis of sales figures, customer contracts, preliminary agreements, forms of payment and all aspects of the customer relationship.
Employment situation: This section covers an analysis of all aspects of the company staff, employment contracts, organisational structure, remuneration policy, job descriptions, etc.
Technological analysis: All the hardware and software used by the company is analysed. Whether they are owned or not, whether they use licences, how much they cost, level of obsolescence of the equipment, etc.
Legal analysis: Here we include all legal aspects influencing the company. Contracts (leases, with suppliers, with distributors, etc.). Analysis of legal compliance with the Data Protection Act and other types of regulations.
Question 1: What is the fundamental aim of the Foodtech Fund, which you have launched together with the Basque Culinary Center? What are the fund’s investment criteria?
The fund’s aim is to invest in tech companies that will lead the transformation of the agri-food sector.
The fund will be investing in companies in the early growth phases, above all in Series A funding rounds of companies in the AgTech and Food Science fields, and those companies in the sector that are implementing circularity in their operations.
Question 2: What do you see as the key to the process of negotiation between the entrepreneur and investor? What is the main point that entrepreneurs always need to bear in mind?
We live in a world where money is commoditised. Entrepreneurs need to understand the added value that the investor will offer them when negotiating in terms of a network of contacts, branding and governance.
Both parties also always need to understand that the startup-investor relationship is there for the long term
Our proposition is to be a greater value-added investor for our investees.
We are the only AgriFoodTech fund focused on Europe and Israel offering a Scale Platform to support entrepreneurs. The entrepreneur, their team and the company are essential for us, and we believe in adding value through a dedicated team, offering assistance wherever they may need.
Question 3: How do you see the foodtech sector in the Basque Country compared with other regions?
The Basque Country is a leader in the culinary and food world.
And it also has a very substantial regional investor and corporate structure for startup investment and scaling. Institutions such as the Basque Government and the Basque Culinary Centre are undertaking various
initiatives with the aim of creating a global ecosystem from the Basque Country. This will place the Basque Country on the entrepreneurial map in the coming years
Having said that, ecosystems in places such as Israel are well ahead of the Basque Country right now. The Basque Country needs to follow the example of ecosystems like Israel in adopting measures that will keep making it more competitive. Although major public-private initiatives are already emerging.
As reflected in significant differences in terms of investment and divestment figures, as well as the presence of foreign companies in search of high technology.
Euskadi is a leader in the culinary and food
world.
Seek quality expert advice. That is to say, lawyers with proven experience in this sector of investment rounds.
The term sheet is a document signed by both parties (investor and company or promoter team). It’s usually negotiated with the first investor. It includes the basic terms and conditions of the investment.
What are the most important clauses in a term sheet?
Convertible notes are loan agreements between an investor and a company which have the feature that the investor is entitled to convert the loan into
stock in the next investment round.
The investor that advances the money for the project through this loan will receive a set discount on the valuation of the company when the deed is signed. A 20% discount rate is fairly typical.
Convertible notes offer numerous benefits for the founding team:
What are the final documents?
The final documents are: the shareholder agreement, the capital increase sheet and the public deed.
If we have got things right with the term sheet, this part shouldn’t be a problem. It is simply a question of having our legal advisers set out all the agreed terms in a shareholder agreement.
The shareholder agreement is most often signed remotely using a digital signature application.
This is a document indicating the main conditions of the capital increase, as well as the number of shares issued, the names of the investors subscribing the shares, the amount of the share capital and the amount of the share premium. It must be signed by all the parties.
Question 1: Which clauses of a term sheet are hardest for the founding partners to accept?
I would divide them into two types:
Hard to accept in personal terms.
Lock-in (typically 3-5 years) and exclusivity clauses. These clauses are nonnegotiable for investment funds and represent a very substantial commitment for the founders, since once they accept that a VC will provide them with funding, the VC will demand complete commitment to the company by the entrepreneurs, both in terms of time (continue working at the company for X years) and dedication (save for certain exceptions, exclusive dedication to the project funded is an essential aspect for investors).
Vesting. A vesting formula is also typically established, closely tied in with the above, which essentially is a periodic consolidation of the stock held by
the Founders, tied to their lock-in period. For example: If a Founder has 75% (and the Investor 25%) and a lock-in period of 4 years is established, the vesting formula might typically be: Year 1, no consolidation; and Years 2, 3 and 4, 25% of the stock vests each year. And what happens if I leave? A distinction is normally made between the concepts of Good Leaver (justified or agreed) and Bad Leaver (unjustified departures), which typically means that in the former case the stock that is not consolidated by the date of departure is forfeited, and in the latter case, all of the stock.
This is a very harsh clause, but it is the guarantee for the Investors that the Founders won’t “run out on them”, or if that happens, they will be able to use the shares recovered from the leaving Founder to attract replacements.
Hard to accept in economic terms.
Liquidation Preference. There are various versions, some harsher than others (we always recommend accepting at the most 1x Non-Participating), but the basic version means that if the company is sold, if the Investor would be entitled to less liquidity than the investment made, the Investor recovers ALL the money they put in, and the remainder is for the founders. The problem? What happens if it is a very tight sale and all or nearly all the money is taken by the VC (who might not lose or lose very little), and the entrepreneur, after years of slaving away, driving the business forward, being paid very little, with a huge opportunity cost, is left with very little, or nothing at all?
We recommend the Safety Net Clause for such situations, which generates the fiction that the Entrepreneur is also an investor up to an agreed amount. This figure would cover the personal effort, opportunity cost, etc. (in truth it provides the entrepreneur with vital cover after the venture ends). And so liquidation preference applies equally to all investors (the VC and the entrepreneur, for this fictitious amount), thereby guaranteeing that in all cases the entrepreneur will always receive liquidity in the event of a sale, however little it might be.
Drag-Along Right of the Investors and similar (including Unilateral Put Option including certain investors). These are clauses which allow the investors to sell the company when they see fit (even if the founder is opposed), or in the worst case scenario, known as the Put Option, the Investor is entitled to oblige the Founder to buy all their stock after a certain period of time at the market value, which then gives rise to a potential future economic obligation for the Founder which, given the salary typically taken by entrepreneurs, might be unaffordable.
We would not recommend accepting either of the two.
Mattress Clause, which generates a fiction that
the Entrepreneur is also an investor in an
agreed figure.
In the first case, there are alternative formulas that can give the Investor the capacity to explore the market and their exit routes, at all times in coordination with the interests of the Board of Directors. One typical formula is to set a maximum exit horizon for the Investor (typically 5-7 years), allowing the Investor to spend that time requesting offers from the Founders, and if they do not want to buy or the offer is too low, the Investor can ask the Board to appoint a consultant to establish a market valuation range and place the Company on the market to explore offers (normally establishing extensions justified by the Board if they believe it would be better to wait before turning to the market, so as to increase the valuation). If there are offers to acquire the Investor’s stake, they could sell to a third party, and if the only offers are for the whole company, the Investor could “force” a sale of the complete company, provided that a pre-defined valuation threshold is surpassed. But in both cases the Founders will enjoy a right of first refusal to purchase the Investor’s stock (it is easier to obtain bank debt to embark on a stock purchase, normally guaranteed by shares in the company itself, if there are binding offers acknowledging the valuation).
And in the second case, because this is an obligation that could be accepted at established businesses (Private Equity operations), but not at a startup where the valuation of the company is linked more to future expectations (and subject to risk), the founders have not been able to obtain the capital to take on obligations (no dividend is distributed at startups, since if there is liquidity, it is instead reinvested in growth), while furthermore the founders typically limit their salaries as tightly as possible, so that their return comes from the Exit (thereby aligning their interests with the Investors), not from the day-to-day running of the business.
Question 2: What can the founding partners of a project do so that the process of searching for investment does not go on too long?
Get advice. The most typical problem faced by founders is that they don’t properly understand how venture capital works, the industry players, or the key elements. And so they typically think of the Investor as a general concept, that might put money into any decent business in any phase.
And that’s not the way it works. Industrial Partners invest in a certain way, and with certain pros and contras. Venture capital invests in a very limited way in projects that fulfil certain very specific criteria. And beyond that there are funds specialising in different sectors, business types, different phases of company maturity, etc.
And so the first point is to understand what type of business you have and whether you are investible or not (it may be that you aren’t, and might never be, and so should set aside the process of searching for investment; equity finance is not right for all businesses). And if you are, then you need to know the right type of investor.
From that point, if you can confirm that you are investible, the first thing you need to do is prepare the business to be attractive to the type of target investor (which doesn’t just mean the story and paperwork, but sometimes also milestones, KPIs, data, customers, etc.). And once you are ready, then you can indeed reach out to the market in search of the most reliable form of investment available.
An entrepreneur can only do all the above if they get proper advice from fundraising experts.
Otherwise they are engaging in what we call Entrepreneur Tourism. You head out looking for investors, but you won’t get any. It’s a waste of time. These are very lengthy processes.
Likewise, once you have investors that want to acquire a stake in the company, then advice again becomes essential in order to make rapid, sound and professional progress. In this case, lawyers specialising in venture capital operations. Because ultimately these specialists speak the same language as the VCs and their lawyers, they will educate you as an entrepreneur, and also know how to convey your concerns/red lines to the Investor, and turn them into legal solutions in the Term Sheet/Shareholder Agreement. And so even if people might in general imagine the opposite, the way to speed up the investment process without making mistakes is to bring in good lawyers who are specialists in venture capital, once there are investors around the table.
In conclusion, to speed up investment processes (or to speed up the decision not to go down this path, and avoid wasting time): what the entrepreneur can do is to choose good advice in both phases: the search for investment and the negotiation of the operation.
To speed up investment processes, what the
entrepreneur can do is select good advice in the
two phases, investment search and operation
negotiation.
Do you need guidance during the process of creating your company or launching your project? The ONekin! Program accompanies and guides you according to your needs.
If you have any questions, please send them to us through this form and we will contact you.
INFORMATION RELATED TO THE PROCESSING OF YOUR PERSONAL DATA
Controller: The HAZI FOUNDATION processed personal data on behalf of the Basque Government.. Purpose: Management of the actions arising from the ONEKIN programme.. Additional information and rights: You can exercise the rights related to the processing of y our data and obtain further information about this processing on our website’s privacy policy. .